Search for: "STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Nevins, 295 AD2d 887, 887 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N.Y. v State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court also left intact its landmark decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
Today, in our predominately rural/wilderness borough, these companion animals continue to provide many of us companionship and a measurable sense of well being1 as well as more utilitarian services such as rodent control and early warning of potential dangers2 such as bears and intruding humans. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services Government & Administrative Law, Health Law U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Vance v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
 Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
 Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
A municipality may also face liability where a drainage system is negligently constructed, Smith v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___ (2020) (directive limiting in-person worship services to 50 people); South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]