Search for: "STATE, ETC. v. National Advertising Co." Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
National Union Fire Insurance Co., 2010 WL 3928704 (D. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
As usual, the Court's docket is crowded with important preemption cases: Altria Group v Good (are state claims about deceptive advertising by cigarette manufacturers preempted by federal labeling laws?) [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
By contrast, the web 2.0 market, like Google, Facebook, last.fm etc etc, charge nothing so have to make money out of selling something, ie ads for other services and companies. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:25 am by Sasha Volokh
For these reasons, Carter Coal, not Association of National Advertisers, dictates our answer to this constitutional conundrum. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm by Howard Knopf
Fournier,2012 FC 803 (CanLII), This was an action against a website owner and the National Post – involving fair dealing, copyright in titles, etc. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Instead, a majority of the Court had held that "something more" was necessary - a state-specific design or advertising, etc. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Co-use with alcohol may pose an incremental risk for impaired driving and co-use with tobacco may increase smoking-related lung disease. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
See Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]