Search for: "STATE HIGHWAY COMM N v ARMS"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Armory Comm’n v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
For this reason, an arm or instrumentality of the State generally enjoys the same immunity as the sovereign itself. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2011) (right to arms would be meaningless without right to “maintain proficiency” by “training and practice” at a shooting range); Illinois Ass’n of Firearms Retailers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Driehaus, 814 F.3d 466, 476 (6th Cir. 2016); 281 Care Comm. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
