Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. P."
Results 1 - 20
of 4,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm
Today’s judgment in Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (“GSK”) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
A while ago we noted the Court of Justice's judgment in Joined Cases C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies v Council and Commission. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 9:40 pm
The Court of Justice in Joined Case C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Sweden and Turco v Council overruled a judgment of the Court of First Instance refusing to give public access to a document of the Council's Legal service containing legal advice. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:26 am
39/05 P and C? [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
[ed: Which, to be fair, may be to their benefit, based on the fires currently raging out of control]I reached out to my P&C guru Bill M, who pointed out that:A) Yes, this certainly appears to be fraud, andB) In the grand scheme of things, 1500 incidents over 10 years seems more likely the actions of a "rogue" agency than systemic. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:53 pm
Here's an interesting judgment handed down the other day about the liability of a member State for failure to recongize the marketing authorization for a drug granted pursuant to Directive 2001/83 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use in another member State. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
The Court of Justice handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-266/05 P Sison v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm
Blogpost 20/2024 On 7 March 2024, the ECJ released two very important decisions on the extent of the definition of ‘personal data’ under EU data protection law in cases C-479/22 P and C-604/22. [read post]
3 May 2009, 4:11 am
In Case C-362/06 P Markku Sahlstedt and Others v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
P. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
The Bulletin reiterates New York’s long-held and codified position that group P&C policies are generally impermissible in the state unless they fall into a number of narrow exceptions, such as when additional-named insureds (1) are under common control, (2) are franchisees with regards to related interests, (3) are members of a joint venture, (4) are family members, or (5) otherwise have shared common interests in the risk being insured. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
313, at p. 316. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
The Court of Justice has handed down a rather complex judgment in Case C-229/05 P PKK and KNK v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
On this past Saturday's broadcast of C-SPAN's "America and the Courts": Last month, the AEI Legal Center for the Public Interest held a two-day event titled "Transatlantic Law Forum: Citizenship in Europe and the United States. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
The former provision prevents the registration of non-distinctive signs, which cannot fulfil the essential function of a trade mark; the latter ensures that 'descriptive signs relating to one or more characteristics of the goods or services in respect of which registration as a mark is sought may be freely used by all traders offering such goods or services' (see Case C‑173/04 P Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, and Case C‑191/01 P OHIM v Wrigley). [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:55 pm
Lecture by Leslie C. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:20 pm
On September 6, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied summary judgment for vitamin C manufacturers in In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1738 (Decision (Vit C)). [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
The judgment in Case C-125/06 P Commission v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Evans to United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:56 pm
Homeowners in the United States Homeowners’ insurance represents the second-largest revenue generator for P&C insurance companies. [read post]
