Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D.J."
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 11:24 am
Garcia, No. 10-55637 (10-29-13)(Bencivengo, D.J., with Tashima and Bybee). [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:55 am
Fletcher and Gertner, D.J.). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:02 pm
Poyfair, an attorney for Usana. “Usana is regularly identified as the gold standard in network marketing by state and federal regulators.” (emphasis mine) Dare I ask D.J. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:05 am
The 9th holds that state law can indeed create a liberty interest in early eligibility for parole. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:22 am
The Court of Appeals (Korman [D.J.], Carney and Pooler) applies that rule here, sending the case back to the district court to take up the federal claim only.the construction of the provision of the NIFA Act at issue raises an unresolved issue of state law – the interpretation of a poorly drawn statute – that should be resolved by the New York state courts because the manner in which the statute is construed implicates significant state… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 5:15 pm
Bare, No. 14-10475 (11-24-15)(Tallman with Rosenthal, D.J.; Kozinski dissenting). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 11:44 am
David Joseph “D.J. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:20 pm
Ruiz-Gaxiola, No. 08-10378 (9-24-10) (Reinhardt with Kozinski and Timlin, D.J.). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm
Onuoha, No. 15-50300 (4-20-16)(Gould with Berzon and Steeh, D.J.) [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:50 am
Meshell, 34 FLW 41, Fla, L & L, 800.04(4) not D.J. violation when oral sex and vaginal penetration in one single criminal episode can be more than one count, elements of different proof and and therefore distinct criminal actsEvans, 34 FLW 150, 4th DCA, tampering with evidence-evidence that def threw or dropped cocaine rock in sand and ofcs were unable to find, without further evidence of specific intent to tamper with or conceal the evidence was insufficient to find anything more… [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:34 pm
In a curiously limited ruling announced on January 18, the Supreme Court of Iowa disapproved a determination by Polk County District Court Judge D.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
Graf, No. 07-50100 (7-7-10) (Tallman with O'Scannlain and Block, D.J.). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:21 am
/Matter of D.J., N.D.R., and N.J., ? [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:52 am
Bohn, No. 09-30397 (9-17-10) (Graber with Paez and Burns, D.J.). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF D.J., N.D.R., AND N.R., App. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:41 am
The Court of Appeals (Raggi, Droney and Kaplan [D.J.]) says, "Generally, 'there is no constitutionally protected property interest in prospective government employment,' but a written or verbal communication guaranteeing government employment may, in some circumstances, give rise to a such a property interest." [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am
But there is some judicial modesty here: the Court does not say that all state deadlines must be waived in the interests of accommodating the disabled. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
D.J., EDNY, with Kozinski and Callahan).The district court had found the juvenile to be a juvenile, but left open whether the court could reconsider in the interests of justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:05 pm
Smith with Rawlinson and Jones, D.J., D, Nev.) [read post]
