Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF R.C."
Results 1 - 20
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
Accordingly, the First District found that R.C. 2903.11(B)(1) does not violate either state or federal equal protection rights, since Ohio has a legitimate interest in stopping the spread of HIV, and that the disclosure requirement of R.C. 2903.11(B)(1) is rationally related to this goal. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:14 am
In November 2008, BWC filed suit against McKinley and Heritage in Columbiana County, Ohio, asserting that they were jointly and severally liable to the state for failing to honor the state’s subrogation interest in the settlement that had been reached between them. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Further, R.C. 2307.60 states that civil actions exist for damages caused by criminal acts. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
The state’s interests are these: [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:25 am
’s retention in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Reference our new state law survey for a quick read on the interest rate(s) that apply to state tax deficiencies. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
” In any case, the state chose not to retry Ayers, who was released from prison September 12, 2011. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Perritt, The Future of Wrongful Dismissal Claims: Where Does Employer Self Interest Lie? [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Caspary has an interest in the diverse area of business law. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
Ultimately, the court remanded the case for the state to prove both, but without the presumption in R.C. 2933.81(B), which it [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Eventually, Coal Royalty and all the mineral rights’ lessees were realigned on one side as the plaintiffs in this case.Elements of State LawOhio’s Dormant Mineral Act, R.C. 5301.56, is part of the Marketable Title Act and creates a method to rejoin a surface property with abandoned mineral interests. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
It can mean that retaining the employee would not benefit or advance the interests of the agency. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
Had R.C. 4117.13(D) been intended to limit jurisdiction, it would have incorporated language similar to that of R.C. 4117.02(O), which states that, for matters of public or great general interest, SERB can “certify its final order directly to the court of appeals having jurisdiction over the area in which the principal office of the public employer directly affected by the application or interpr [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
R.C. 955.11 simply states the definition of a dangerous dog. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
