Search for: "STATE OF ARIZONA v. ROBERT JAMES MAJOR" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am by David Gans
  With the focus on whether the Court will strike down our nation’s most iconic civil rights law, there has been virtually no attention to the fact that, when the Justices convene again on March 18th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a second major voting rights case, Arizona v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:17 pm by Benjamin Justus
 Queen of the Desert stars James Franco, Nicole Kidman and Robert Pattinson. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
In another case going against a criminal defendant, Justice Souter likewise voted with the 5-4 majority in James v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm by Luke Rioux
 +James Novak has an article on Arizona Drug Sentencing explaining a similar sytem there. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:15 pm by Lovechilde
James Fallows recently wrote with regard to the Affordable Care Act case that "confidence in the very idea that the Roberts majority will approach this as a "normal" legal matter, rather than as one more Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Nabiha Syed
” The Florida Independent reports on Spanish-language media commentary on Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
In a widely read Atlantic piece, James Fallows just accused the five Justices--Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito--of being part of a judicial "coup" running back to Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In Robert Comer's case, his close friend, Robert Vickers, whom he had met on Arizona's death row, was executed in 1999. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” That state constitutions could be “more protective of liberty interests” than the Federal Constitution, she added, was part of the fundamental “vigor” of a system in which state courts were “absolutely free to interpret state constitutional provisions to accord greater protections to individual rights than do similar provisions of the United States Constitution” (citing Arizona v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, James Gottry weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The greatest test for Roberts may not be simply to marshal a majority to overturn this ruling. [read post]