Search for: "STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
The ACLU’s Vivek Malhotra, on the other hand, argues the law “represents the most serious incursion by a state into the federal province of immigration regulation and enforcement since California’s Proposition 187 in the 1990s. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:46 pm
The US Supreme Court has recently voted 5-3 (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 am
The US Supreme Court has recently voted 5-3 (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm
On June 30, 2011, the California Supreme Court handed down the decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
After a federal court in Missouri halted the CMS Rule in 10 states (see Missouri v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
The current community property states are Wisconsin, California, Louisiana, Nevada, Washington, Texas, Arizona, Idaho, and New Mexico. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm
Aaron Nielson has a fascinating post at the Notice and Comment blog on Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:26 am
In March, a federal judge ruled in favor of death-row inmates in Tennessee, Arizona and California who argued that foreign-manufactured sodium thiopental should be banned because it has not been FDA-approved for importation. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:26 am
In Sullivan et al v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
District Court for the District of Arizona issued an order in Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
’” Miller v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Oracle argued that Arizona and Colorado law should apply because the employees regularly work and live in those states. [read post]
