Search for: "STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF C. F."
Results 61 - 80
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm
Robins, 1 Cox’s C. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
Louisiana (1964). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
Inamed Corp., ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 2681445 (11th Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Code § 3553(c), a sentencing court must state `the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Searle & Co., 246 F. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
., 921 F. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:00 am
(f) In New Mexico, interest will accrue on second quarter payments, but not first quarter payments, made after their original due date. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
§§ 1692b, c, g, and creates a federal cause of action for debtors under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
§§ 1692b, c, g, and creates a federal cause of action for debtors under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak, 335 F. 3d 357, 363-364 (5th Cir. 2003)(Reversing injunction, noting "Even though the ultimate decision whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction is reviewed only for abuse of discretion, a decision grounded in erroneous legal principles is reviewed de novo. ... [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
(“A/C” means “on account of). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Schwarz Pharma, Inc., 702 F.3d 177, 186 (5th Cir. 2012) (design defect claims are “failure-to-warn claims under different names” and preempted) (applying Louisiana law); Frazier v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alabama[8], Illinois[9], Kentucky[10], Louisiana[11], Tennessee[12], and Washington[13]. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Bowman (Michigan State), Abigail English (Center for Adolescent Health & the Law, N.C.), Gerard F. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Cox, 342 F. 2d 167, 171 (CA5 1965). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
There is no dispute that Defendant's public interest as stated in Executive Order No. 141 was: "[F]or the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the people of North Carolina … [S]lowing and controlling community spread of COVID-19 … [T]o lower the risk of contracting and transmitting COVID-19[.] [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1979).Louisiana: Kampmann v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
Decisions of interest to state practitioners will be posted on a monthly basis. [read post]
