Search for: "STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF C. F." Results 101 - 120 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Halliburton, 667 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2012): In a very well reasoned Defense Base Act (“DBA”) decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the DBA is an employee’s exclusive remedy for injuries sustained during employment. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 2:40 pm
Among the items so covered are certain wage replacement payments as specified at Code Sec. 6334(f). [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 77 (1964) (there exists, and the First Amendment protects, "the paramount public interest in a free flow of information to the people concerning public officials, their servants. [read post]
In re Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership and Legends Gaming of Louisiana, LLC. [7] The court confirmed the debtors’ plan of reorganization over the objections of the second lien lenders, who claimed that the plan effectively passed the equityrisk onto them. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am by Bexis
  By the way, in 15 years no state has adopted §6(c) in any prescription drug product liability case. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:11 pm by Bill Marler
F’s: Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 14501(c)(1), and therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
Moreover, as bad as things might get in a particular district, there's always Rule 23(f), and, ultimately, the United States Supreme Court to ensure that Rule 23 doesn't become the bludgeon it had become in the state system. [read post]