Search for: "STATE OF MARYLAND v. STATE OF LOUISIANA" Results 121 - 140 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am by Edward T. Kang
The provision of the DTSA following this one ensures that the law shall not be used as a mechanism to get around state law of those states that have rejected the inevitable disclosure doctrine, namely, California, Louisiana, Maryland and Virginia. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that a Louisiana inmate convicted of murder by a split jury has filed a cert petition, in Ramos v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am by Joyce Kung
Accordingly, the WOTUS Rule is now the controlling law in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Several states, including New York, Maryland, Washington, and Vermont, have already passed legislation directed at such conduct. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
A blatantly discriminatory Maryland tax was only struck down in Maryland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, Louisiana taxes bottled water, but not soda or candy, at the state’s 5 percent general sales tax rate.[8] Meanwhile, Wisconsin levies sales taxes on yogurt covered raisins but not ice cream or popsicles.[9] When political considerations are used to determine sales tax applicability, tax codes become increasingly convoluted and less effective at generating revenue. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:57 am by Michael Madison
” (Hari Osofsky, Penn State University) “Institutional pluralism means that each law school will choose its own path. [read post]