Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF C.P." Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
 Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Insurance Coverage QuestionsThe Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law Blog has described the case of Reifer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Insurance Coverage QuestionsThe Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law Blog has described the case of Reifer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am by MBettman
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  Giovanetti held that New Jersey law, the law of the plaintiff’s residence, was properly applied:In weighing the relative interests of Pennsylvania and New Jersey in this particular litigation, we conclude that New Jersey law is more appropriately applied. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We've been doing some research in anticipation of the upcoming ALI meeting at which the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation will be voted on (we hope ALI members interested in class actions and the like will come out, debate the issues, and vote), and in the spirit of cross-fertilization, we thought we'd share it with our readers. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A Shifting Landscape: Changes Keep Things Interesting for Civil LitigatorsbyDaniel E. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In the end, the court affirmed the entry of a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs over foreign defendants who had raised issues of jurisdictional.The Hammons case presented a law school essay type of jurisdictional challenge in a matter involving a lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania by an Indiana resident who had a surgical procedure performed in Indiana and who alleged injuries from an implanted pelvic mesh that was manufactured by New Jersey corporate defendants.The Pennsylvania… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Eastman Kodak Co., 726 A.2d 955 (New Jersey Super. 1999). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Under Erie, federal courts are not supposed to invent new liability under their own state’s law; Block is even worse, inventing liability under the unfamiliar law of a different state.Fourth, and finally, adding insult to injury, Block denied all of the defendant’s Daubert motions. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by June Casey
She clerked for Justice Alan Handler of the New Jersey Supreme Court and practiced with a boutique civil rights firm in New York City, now called Emery, Celli, Brinckerhoff & Abady LLC. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
Companies inventing new drugs incur more liability, while non-innovative generic manufac­turers have less responsibility for their own products. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Plaintiffs were residents of New Jersey, and the complained-of surgery occurred in Delaware. [read post]