Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JONATHAN THOMAS" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 2:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Were Pennsylvania and New Jersey to lack standing in this case, it seems that other state litigants would have a more difficult time pressing their claims in federal court. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
New Jersey, holding that facts increasing the defendant’s statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
Ruhnke) http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a0603-06.pdf NEW JERSEY CRIMES AND OFFENSES - ELEMENTS State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Schwartz's guest blogposts here in December--by Michael Ramsey on the Originalism Blog here, with a response to the response by David Schwartz here.ICYMI:  A new exhibit on Gideon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Jonathan H. Adler
New Jersey, in which the Court upheld a FERC-authorized pipeline company's authority to use eminent domain to condemn rights-of-way across state-owned land. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Killing capital punishment in New Jersey the first state in modern history to repeal its death penalty statute. 41 Univ Toledo Law Rev 485 (2010). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the foundation’s amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the pending cert petition in Christie v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The same caveat appears in the New Jersey Plan (“to appoint all federal officers not otherwise provided for”); the resolutions given to the Committee of Detail (“to appoint to Offices in Cases not otherwise provided for”); the Randolph/Rutledge draft for the Committee of Detail (“to appoint to offices not otherwise provided for. [read post]