Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. S.C" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 11:00 pm
Sep. 24, 2009): The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the state's disinterment statute does not automatically give a surviving spouse authority to disinter the deceased spouse, even though the surviving spouse has... [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:52 am by Skoloff & Wolfe
Thomas DeCataldo, a partner in Skoloff & Wolfe’s matrimonial department, was recently designated to represent the New Jersey State Bar Association’s Family Law Executive Committee as a co-author to an amicus submission filed with the Supreme Court of New Jersey in the published decision of S.C. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Bexis
Aug. 9, 2012), will be the subject of Monday’s post, as our Dechert colleagues are from New Jersey and wanted to write about that one.The other one, Weston v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:03 am by Gregory Forman
I had a recent phone conference with a New Jersey attorney as we discussed the advantages of disadvantages of fighting an alimony case in South Carolina versus fighting it in New Jersey. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Shortly after arriving in the United States, Respondent traveled to Trenton, New Jersey, where she knew classmates from Ecuador, and rented a room. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Company Doe, 749 F.3d at 269-270, 270-71 (4th Cir. 2014); S.C. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:02 am by John Day
Law Div. 1993) (discussing the use of negligent spoliation in New Jersey). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
The other states (Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, North Dakota, and Utah) use fraud on the FDA as an exception to compliance-based bars on punitive damages. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
FTC * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?) [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Courts in New York and New Jersey have been relatively consistent regarding the required consideration for a restrictive covenant. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm by Peter A. Steinmeyer
Courts in New York and New Jersey have been relatively consistent regarding the required consideration for a restrictive covenant. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
  For example, although the plaintiff received noticed of the bankruptcy case, and was clearly aware of his injury at that time, the New Jersey Supreme Court boldly states that the "Plaintiff was not a creditor of the bankrupt. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
No. 2, 518 S.E.2d 259, 261 n.7 (S.C. 1999); Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  New Jersey In this case, the New Jersey Office of the Comptroller, Medicaid Fraud Division, (New Jersey Comptroller) alleged that one of its Medicaid providers had improperly billed 99050 for services which it provided during “regular office hours. [read post]