Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SAMUEL RYAN" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm by Mark Walsh
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thomas, though, has stated that view as a dissenter, most notably in the 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
At Good Judgment, Ryan Adler “puts this as a win for the crowd,” noting that “forecasters held a tight range of a 75% to 80% chance that the Supreme Court would rule that Congress couldn’t prevent New Jersey from repealing its own state prohibitions on sports gambling. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
For example, although New Jersey’s new sports betting law (which was the test case that gave rise to the Murphy v NCAA ruling) prohibits wagering on New Jersey-related college games, it permits gambling on out-of-state games involving out-of-state college teams. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” At Legal Sports Report, Ryan Rodenberg charts a path to “a 9-0 vote [in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that in Lozman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a constitutional challenge to the federal ban on sports betting, “New Jersey is the favorite and the sports league quintet are heavy underdogs. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm by John Elwood
” Transfer of sacred land First up among the new relists this week is Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
Currently, Justice Samuel Alito is the only non-participant. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
Marty Schwimmer, at The Trademark Blog, is thinking about Marilyn Monroe and Betty Crocker and Aunt Jemima, and the likelihood of confusion.In New Jersey, Ron Coleman of Likelihood of Confusion asks, "What business does the FTC have regulating bloggers and deciding what they should and should not disclose? [read post]