Search for: "STATE V. BERNAL" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by SHG
The case is called Riley’s American Heritage Farms v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
Jaeger VA Regional Office: Cleveland, Ohio Veteran’s Representative at BVA: The American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 20, 2017 Date of CAVC Decision: July 12, 2019 The post PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: Buffington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm by cdw
Virginia was decided two decision concerning “mental retardation” are noted, Alvin Bernal Jackson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
  Paul Bernal had a post about the decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Paul Bernal has covered the curious incident of “the fake vicar” on Newsnight and draws pointed analogies to the issue of outlet credibility and integrity. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Paul Bernal’s new book “What do we know and what should we do about internet privacy? [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Bernal, 22 S.W.3d 425, 437 (Tex.2000) (holding that class action is procedural device which does not alter the substantive requirements of the underlying substantive claim); Winters v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Paul Bernal has published his criticisms of the UK government’s new anti-encryption campaign, finding it to be “based on many false assumptions, but the biggest of all of these is the whole idea that hiding is a bad thing. [read post]