Search for: "STATE V. MANN" Results 41 - 60 of 932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2022, 8:23 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Justices to Consider Whether Warhol Image is “Fair Use” of Photograph of Prince First off today, Ronald Mann at SCOTUSblog reports that, tomorrow, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is expected to hear arguments in the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm by INFORRM
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mann, 283 A.D . .2d at 293;Greenwich v Markhoff, 234 A.D.2d 112, 114 (1st Dep’t 1996); Gotay v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:06 am by CMS
Mann J’s declaration recognised this and was a proper exercise of his discretion. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, explained the court, "Whether a particular statement constitutes an opinion or objective fact is a question of law," [see Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d at 276]. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, explained the court, "Whether a particular statement constitutes an opinion or objective fact is a question of law," [see Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d at 276]. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Justices require actual knowledge that application was erroneous to invalidate copyright filing — Writing at ScotusBlog, Ronald Mann takes a look at Thursday’s decision in Unicolors v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” by Emily Opilo and Alex Mann for Baltimore Sun Ethics National: “Palin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google… [read post]