Search for: "STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. POWERS"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
The FDA is an administrative agency, so its powers have to be delegated by Congress. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Is the Executive Branch (the Department of Justice or the regulatory agencies) looking at the same issue? [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Ex parte United States, 242 U.S. 27, 37 S.Ct. 72, 61 L.Ed. 129 (1916). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
The 2012 OVDP was available to those concerned with criminal prosecution and provided certainty relative to taxes and offshore penalties. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
In its brief in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
This one is on behalf of the bloggers at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court of Texas Blog, How Appealing, InstaPundit, and Power Line (3/4 of the bloggers there), in SEIU v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Initiative use ex-ploded in the following decades, reaching a peak of 377 in the 1990s, 177 of which were approved. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The complainer was advised that the reporter was free to depart from the recommendations of the previous reporter, but the solicitor was not told of this. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
“While an entity must be authorized pursuant to state law to be within the ambit of the Open Meetings Law . . . , not every entity whose power is derived from state law is deemed to be performing a governmental function. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
WerholtzCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-3040 November 10, 2011 Judge: Hartz Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law Plaintiffs, a group of inmates in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC), sued Defendant Roger Werholtz, Secretary of KDOC (the Secretary), under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
