Search for: "STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. POWERS"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply brief CVSG Information:Invited: March 21, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
See United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
NRG Power Mkt’g v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm
Attorney General indicated that the Department of Justice would not defend the constitutionality of the law or enforce it.(2) The final judgment entered in that case declaring the law unconstitutional applies only to a limited number of attorneys. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
The Department of Justice would be free to argue for changes in the law. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Supreme Court, Nassau County, granted the preliminary injunction, and the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
S 4865 BLURB : Fam Ct. powers of the S.P.C.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
