Search for: "STATE v BLACK" Results 1 - 20 of 10,028
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Complaint wrote that Dial – an entity with more than 400 shareholder/drivers – was “once one of the leading black car corporate limousine services in the New York City metropolitan area,” but its business model was “decimated” by the recent “proliferation of app-based car services such as Uber and Lyft. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” Daniels described feeling “blacked out,” though she was not drunk or drugged. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Among other flaws, they often do not apply well to the Brown case itself, which famously originated in a challenge to segregation in Topeka, Kansas, a state in which – unlike most of the South – Blacks had long had the right to vote. [read post]