Search for: "STATE v MONDRAGON" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2010, 4:44 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
That is kind of what happened in the 1997 case, Cirilo Mondragon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am by Tobias Thienel
The Convention also forbade States parties from conferring such immunities from (severe) criticism on their own (republican) heads of State (Artun and Güvener v Turkey, para 31; Pakdemirli v Turkey, paras 52 et seq). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm by Margaret Wood
  The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am by Jon Gelman
 YURIEL MONDRAGON CALIX v A2Z UNIVERSAL, Civil Action No.: 15-cv-3169 (PGS), 2018 WL 1003270,  (Slip Copy (D. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]