Search for: "STATE v POWERS" Results 21 - 40 of 40,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
-linked assets held outside the United States that would clear through the U.S. financial system. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
Constitutionally, the doctrine of separation of powers allocates the responsibility for assessing and addressing risks to national security to the executive. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am by Chris Castle
And if you think that Israel is having a hard time with “Palestinian peaceful protesters”. just wait until China invades Taiwan and the word goes out from TikTok to Gaza by the Potomac to start condemning the Taiwanese breakaway province and imperialist protectorate of the evil United States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
But that doesn't give a state the power to punish citizens who travel to another state to use weed. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]