Search for: "STATE v STRAWN"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
An employer or any other person or entity that violates this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor… Before you ask, sure, that would seem to mean that if an employee (and applicant for employment as well as stated in a footnote in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York Pistol and Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
In the Ninth Circuit appeal of the Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:59 pm
True Chemical (or just Performance Chemical v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:34 am
Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746, 749 [2d Dept 2006]). [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am
But the prior owners of the VLSI v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Opp. 16 n.1 (citing the United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
John Keville, partner at Winston & Strawn LLP and attorney for Contour, stated “We are pleased with the rulings from US District Court’s Northern District. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
Farr v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am
An exception exists and liability may be extended where a plaintiff sufficiently pleads acts of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, 119 AD3d 442 [Pt Dept 2014]). [read post]
