Search for: "STATE v STRAWN" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York Pistol and Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 11:26 am by Shannon Hill
John Keville, partner at Winston & Strawn LLP and attorney for Contour, stated “We are pleased with the rulings from US District Court’s Northern District. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
., Winston & Strawn, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Sheppard Mullin, Wells Fargo, Proskauer Rose and Manatt Phelps Phillips. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
Today, DRI filed an amicus curiae brief in the United States Supreme Court in CompuCredit Corporation and Synovus Bank v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Florida, which concerns the constitutionality of life without parole for juvenile criminals; United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  They were set forth in bullet fashion in the opinion: “The allegation that, while representing plaintiff in the assignment-of-lease negotiations, counsel secretly represented the counterparty so as to obtain favorable terms for the counterparty, which resulted in a lower-than-market price for the assignment, states a claim for legal malpractice (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 119 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
The reasoning: Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]