Search for: "STATE v TWEED" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am by John Jascob
The SEC handles disgorgement and the DOJ imposes penalties and they do not double count, he stated. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
” (citing Galef v Alexander and Edgar v MITE Corp, respectively, p.15) And so, as agreed by the parties, Dutch law would apply to this action. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
" On March 20, the Supreme Court issued the decision in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Paul Tweed has an opinion piece in the Journal.ie, “Ireland is in prime position to hold social networks to account – and we must. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:30 am
Moreover, when an applicant for a Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) seeks approval to export preparatory data, the State Department may ask him to obtain the approval of the owner, thus forcing him to disclose his strategy. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]