Search for: "STATE v WOZNIAK" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 1:28 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
For employers negotiating class action settlements including attorneys’ fees, this ruling provides insight into the potential complications in dealing with fractured class counsel constituencies, and a reminder about the limits of federal courts’ willingness to enjoin parallel state court proceedings. ****** In Dakota Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
On June 1, 2015, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas  issued its decision in Associated Builders & Contractors of Tex., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
Oracle once stated its intent to "bring Android back into the Java fold" by making Google comply with the Java rules the rest of the industry has accepted. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Freudenthal of Davis & Cannon, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Rebecca Hitchcock Noecker of Beatty & Wozniak, Denver, Colorado. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm by WSLL
Beatty of Beatty, Wozniak & Reese, PC. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Wozniak & Anor v Randall [2021] EWHC 2341 (QB) (19 August 2021), Soole J gave judgment after the trial of a libel action, finding for the claimants and awarding each of them damages of £7,500. [read post]