Search for: "STATE v. BARRAGAN"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 7:19 am
The Court cited various cases including United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
Veltmann-Barragan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
But courts usually defer to the police in making these sorts of judgements: Judges usually conclude that added questioning didn’t extend the length of the stop too much, and so the stop was still reasonable.Given that usual pattern, I was surprised when I first saw the blurb over at FourthAmendment.com about the Fifth Circuit’s new decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:34 am
In the Northern District of Illinois alone, compare Barragan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
Barragan, 263 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 9:54 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:46 pm
" Lynda V. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
In Gillies v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:37 am
(Barragan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 2:42 pm
"); Sweezy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:11 am
Matus, and Sandra Barragan. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
