Search for: "STATE v. BURKS"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
That's what Judge Liles Burke's opinion in Germany v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am
“The provisions as to property disposition may not be revoked or modified, unless the court finds the existence of conditions that justify the reopening of a judgment under the laws of this State. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Hansberry was bound by the decision in an earlier class action suit, Burke v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
McEwen (Burke Williams & Sorensen LLP) and Michael J. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Department of Energy); Marcilynn Burke (Oregon); Lisa Heinzerling (Georgetown); Monte Mills (Washington); Michele Okoh (Lewis & Clark) Misreading the Record: The Use (and Abuse) of History in Recent Federal Court Cases about the Administrative State Wednesday, January 4, 2023, 3:00-4:40pm We are in the midst of an epochal transformation of the law of the administrative state. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
And two linked articles from Lexology on reforming Scots charity law: Kirstyn Burke: Charity Law Reform in Scotland: Part 1: Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill – what happens next? [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:15 am
In the recent case of Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:17 pm
” The Court also distinguished the case from its 2006 decision in Tri-G, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the law firms) respectively moved pre-answer to dismiss the complaint against them as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [7]). [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm
If the case name Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Still, it would be foolish to reject Jennifer’s cautionary note tout court, just as it might be a mistake to adopt my old teacher Louis Hartz’s dismissal of Burke as an apostle of “mindless” complacence and acceptance of the status quo. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:42 am
” CPLR Rule 3216 may be used to dismiss counterclaims (see Burke, Albright, Harter & Rzepka LLP v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:23 pm
Burke v. [read post]
