Search for: "STATE v. CAMERON JACK"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Adopted a week after the attacks in Paris, the resolution appears to provide grounds for military action and use of force against the Islamic State as Prime Minister David Cameron suggests, but its failure to invoke Chapter 7 explicitly raised questions among Labour opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
” While Britain’s euro-skeptics have suggested that Cameron’s proposal is soft on the issues, others are skeptical that Europe could make the proposed reforms. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm
Prime Minister David Cameron had previously stated that it was “more likely than not” that a terrorist attack was responsible for the disaster. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
(Gary Cameron/Reuters) On Monday, in Zivotovsky v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
Leaders across the world condemned the attack, including UK Prime Minister David Cameron, US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Foreign Minister of Bahrain, Khalid Bin Ahmed Al Khalifa. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Veseley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:21 am
CAMERON KDELL BAGLEYCAMERON KDELL BAGLEY v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:43 pm
In Cameron Moon v. the State of Texas, the appeals court vacated the district court’s judgment and dismissed the case after finding insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s findings related to Moon’s maturity, sophistication, and potential rehabilitation. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am
This reveals that government sources have stated that a concession by the court giving each state discretion on how to implement the ban will allow them to report back every year for an indefinite period on how the process is going, thus allowing Cameron to dodge the issue for the duration of his time in Downing Street. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
United States: A couple from Texas have been awarded $13.8 million in a defamation case against anonymous posters on the internet forum Topix.com, who had accused them of being sexual deviants, molesters, and drug dealers reports ABC News. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Another interesting link features the Daily Mail in the late 1960s: blogger Jack Dyson has reproduced a memo from editor Mike Randall to all staff, concerning journalists’ ethical behaviour. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Secretary of state had reasonable grounds for suspecting BF involved in terrorism. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
One of the cases which would no doubt encourage David Cameron and Jack Straw in that view is the very recent case of Hassan-Daniel v HMRC [2010] EWCA Civ 1443. [read post]
