Search for: "STATE v. DENATALE"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2010, 3:38 am
A pleading in legal malpractice must adequately plead that the defendants "failed to exercise that degree of care, still, and diligence commonly possessed by a member of the legal community," and that their negligence was "a proximate cause of damages" (DeNatale v Santagelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007), and,is sufficient to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:59 am
They’re not missing an “a” and a “v” here or there? [read post]
