Search for: "STATE v. FERRERO"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 4:27 am
Beléndez–Ferrero has argued before the First Circuit Court of Appeals in the cases of Mercado–Alicea v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
The court's press release states that there was no likelihood of confusion between both parties trade marks. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:47 am
The plaintiff in Ferrero v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
Hohenberg et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
In El Pescador Church, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
"); Yocca v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
This weblog has not been uniformly impressed with FIFA's intellectual property activities over the years (see eg "Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken", here; "FIFA's unfair catenaccio on World Cup's IP", here; "Ferrero v FIFA (in the World Cup trade mark dispute) -- 1:0 says the German BGH", here; "Put those vuvuzelas away, here comes FIFA", here; "Pants off in Anti-Ambush Marketing Frenzy", here;… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:44 am
Your incisive comment might just trigger a decision of the UK government to intervene in the proceedings.* Case C-552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market [pompously excessive verbiage deleted], Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH Innsbruck, this being an appeal by Ferrero SpA against the judgment of the General Court in Case T-140/08 (noted by the IPKat, predicting an appeal, here). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
The Court of Appeal reviewed four CJEU decisions which Zynga said cast doubt on L'Oréal: Riha Weser-Gold, Ferrero, Lufthansa Airplus and Kaul. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
See, e.g., Ferrero v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
See, e.g., Ferrero v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Mason v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
– Kellogg North America Company v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
