Search for: "STATE v. GASPAR"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
The Ninth Circuit held in 2005 in Cuevas-Gaspar v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
The Board placed emphasis on the place of the use of the mark in arriving and their decision, stating that there was strong evidence suggesting that Standard Hotels in the United States despite documentation referring to advertisements and promotional campaigns targeting EU customers. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:57 am
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
21 May 2017, 7:38 am
In Salas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Oxford University Press, 1999, v. 2 [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:12 am
The last episode of this story is the judgment delivered by the General Court on 21 February 2024 in Case T-361/21, Papouis Dairies Ltd (and others) v the European Commission. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858 The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
Gaspar “Gapi” Vega ended in the Supreme Court after both sides made final oral submissions. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:20 am
The CJEU stated unequivocally that it was for the national courts to determine whether Amazon had infringed on Louboutin’s trademark, but it did establish a much-appreciated guideline for when to ascribe trade mark infringement to online marketplace operators. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:16 am
Read the full story here India reverts abandoned trademark applications to original status To comply with the 13 April 2023 decision of the High Court of Delhi, India, in Intellectual Property Attorneys Association (IPAA) & Anr. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
In 3 cases, the applicants were not properly represented by a lawyer before the GC: T‑128/21 (Finnish legal counsel), T-716/20 (lawyer was CEO of the applicant), and T‑424/21 (Daimler v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:17 am
United StatesWashington Post v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
The Advancetrack decision E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) was a 2023 High Court trade mark infringement dispute (concerning adwords). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am
As to preliminary references, there were three rulings in 2022 concerning trademarks and one on designs (C-421/20, Acacia v BMW). [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
Belize The Deputy Prime Minister Gaspar Vega has launched a libel case against two parties this week. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
