Search for: "STATE v. GREENFIELD"
Results 1 - 20
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Int’l Amateur Athletic Fed’n, 23 F.3d 1110, 1116–17 (6th Cir. 1994) (considering state law tort and contract claims when determining personal jurisdiction to confirm a domestic arbitral award); Glencore Grain, 284 F.3d at 1123–24 (analyzing the sale of rice to California distributors in evaluating personal jurisdiction to confirm a foreign arbitral award); Greenfield Advisors LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
Linda Thomas-Greenfield stated that the U.S. delegation did not agree with everything in the resolution but that it supports “some of the critical objectives in this non-binding resolution. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am
Despite being a national leader in office to residential conversions, Downtown’s reported office occupancy rate is best described as being in a state of transition. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:26 pm
, O Centro, Lukumi, Holt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
In Baker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Greenfield v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
Plans by the Chinese Fufeng Group to build the mill were also reviewed by CFIUS, which in December 2022 declined to exercise jurisdiction after determining that “greenfield” investments were not covered transactions, which generally require a foreign entity to take over control of a U.S. business, and that the nearby base was not on a designated list of particularly sensitive facilities. [read post]
23 May 2023, 1:09 pm
Greenfield v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield in May 2021 to attend the inauguration of [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Bullock v Miller, 145 AD3d 1215, 1217-1218 [3d Dept 2016]; Miazga v Assaf, 136 AD3d 1131, 1134 [3d Dept 2016], lv dismissed 27 NY3d 1078 [2016]; Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, LLP v Wilson, 136 AD3d 1326, 1328-1329 [4th Dept 2016], lv dismissed 28 NY3d 942 [2016]). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Greenfield v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
The Idaho Supreme Court, for example, stated in Bartosz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
If anything, holding that the statute applies to noise from infill development makes the statute perverse: it would essentially read the statute as encouraging greenfield development far away from people. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
