Search for: "STATE v. HEJDUK"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 2:49 am
The decision is Case C‑441/13, Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria).The facts are as follows. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:28 am
Luckily, the highest court in the European Union has, yet again, graciously stepped up to the challenge to answer this question.The case in question was Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, decided only a bit over a month ago. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:29 pm
Constantin Films v UPC is pending in the CJEU. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has made a very important ruling with regards to jurisdiction for infringing content posted online in the case of Hejduk v EnergieAgentur (C‑441/13). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
He observed that: "It is common ground [see paras 48 to 51 of the judgment of Arnold J in EMI v BSkyB] that if they are targeted at the UK then infringement of UK copyright has been committed by the first defendant. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
[The opinion in the case, Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, is available here; people unfamiliar with reading CJEU decisions might find Martin Husovec’s excellent summary write-up easier to digest and understand]. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Since an action for rectification and removal is indivisible it cannot be brought in each Member State in which the information is or was accessible.] [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
The pending appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
It asks questions around mere accessibility as a threshold for jurisdiction (as found in Pez Hejduk) and the eDate/Martinez ‘centre of interests’ criterion for recovery in respect of the entire harm suffered throughout the EU. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
Everyman has just read the questions referred to the EU Court of Justice in C-441/13 Pez Hejduk. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Following his Opinion earlier today in Pez Hejduk [here], AG Cruz Villalón has in fact just issued another one [once again, available in - amongst others - Italian but not English], this being the much-awaited Opinion in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Dutch Supreme Court seeking clarification as to the following:1. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
