Search for: "STATE v. HUNTER" Results 361 - 380 of 1,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in a case like the 2002 SCOTUS decision in Verizon Md v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:20 pm
The court followed Matter of Settlement Capital Corp v Yates 12 Misc 3d 1198(A) in stating that "fair and reasonable were to be evaluated on a case by case basis and the totality of the circumstances". [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
Justice Hathaway concurred in Justice Kelly’s dissent, and wrote separately to emphasize consternation at the Court’s failure to adhere to People v Hunter and to contest the evidence that the pilot program, and predeliberation jury discussions generally, enhance a jury’s ability to reach a fair result   [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:58 pm by Heidi Meinzer
The statute at the time, Virginia Code Section 3.1-796.122 [currently Code Section 3.2-6570], stated that “[a]ny person who . . . [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Kevin
Hunter's Lessee, in which the Court informed Virginia that oh yeah, it did so have jurisdiction to hear appeals of state-court decisions on federal issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
©Copyright 2008 - The JAG HUNTER [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Frank Crivelli
In defense of the contract Chief of Staff Hunter stated that “Morris County has paid millions to train officers who wind up leaving in a year”. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Turning to Petitioner's challenging the penalty imposed, of termination of his employment, as "excessive", the Appellate Division said in determining whether an imposed disciplinary penalty is excessive, "this Court must consider whether, in light of all the relevant circumstances, the penalty is so disproportionate to the charged offenses as to shock one's sense of fairness",* citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at… [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Turning to Petitioner's challenging the penalty imposed, of termination of his employment, as "excessive", the Appellate Division said in determining whether an imposed disciplinary penalty is excessive, "this Court must consider whether, in light of all the relevant circumstances, the penalty is so disproportionate to the charged offenses as to shock one's sense of fairness",* citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Paul Karlsgodt
  The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]