Search for: "STATE v. JARVIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Second-degree murder After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Brandon Jarvis Heigh, appellant, was convicted of second-degree murder.1 He was sentenced to incarceration for a term of 30 years. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am
Not according to a recent decision by a California intermediate appellate court in Jarvis v Jarvis, No. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
In August 2018, an action was filed with the San Francisco Superior Court to invalidate this tax by, among others, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
DOT v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:00 am
E.g., State of Calif. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm
To illustrate, Justice Myers in Jarvis v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] R v Cole and R v Jarvis [2] That offence is committed where a person surreptitiously observes or makes a visual recording of another person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose [3] Jones v Tsige The post Can Your Boss Access Your Computer Personal Records? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] R v Cole and R v Jarvis [2] That offence is committed where a person surreptitiously observes or makes a visual recording of another person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose [3] Jones v Tsige The post Can Your Boss Access Your Computer Personal Records? [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
Canada On 14 February 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Jarvis 2019 SCC 10 holding that a teacher who recorded students with a hidden camera is guilty of voyeurism, the Supreme Court has ruled. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:23 pm
Today the Supreme Court of Canada issued a very important privacy decision in R v Jarvis. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:23 pm
Today the Supreme Court of Canada issued a very important privacy decision in R v Jarvis. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:52 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight Jarvis Coleman-Fuller, appellant, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Washington County of possession of heroin and possession of cocaine. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:01 am
The leading case is State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm
This comes from a 1984 Court of Appeals decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
