Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 161 - 180
of 901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2017, 9:09 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:13 pm
The Court’s opinion in US ex rel Ruckh v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:01 pm
In the proposed rule, FDA stated that any final rule would become effective one year after the date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:05 am
He has a keen interest in a career at the Bar and he will be enrolling onto the BPTC in September. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:01 am
Which, I believe, is roughly half the population of that State. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:43 pm
He could also have merely limited his holding to state that regardless of whether there was a right to homeschooling, that right doesn't preclude the state from ordering public schooling of an abused child. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
Romano v NY Presbyterian (2006)). [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:37 am
Here is one excerpt of his analysis: In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
Consider, for example, United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:45 am
State, 174 N.J. 412, 417 (2002); Coffman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Most prosecutors in the U.S. enjoy absolute immunity for activities in the criminal process and as advocate for the state (Imbler v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:13 am
” An op-ed in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) urges the Court to grant review in Spokeo v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
This is illustrated by the outcome of the US Supreme Court case United States v Stevens which overturned a ban on animal snuff videos as being an unconstitutional restriction on content. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
Baylson recently released his decision in Boeynaems v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
” At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen also focuses on the questions drafted by the Court and suggests that the second question is “the nagging one. [read post]
