Search for: "STATE v. LOCKETT"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) gave Lockett a broad reading, but Johnson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:23 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
S. 104, 112 (1982) (noting that consideration of the offender’s life history is a “`part of the process of inflicting the penalty of death’”); Lockett v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:54 am
In Question 2, the state contends that the Ninth Circuit also took an overly expansive view of the Lockett rule. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
Ohio, Eddings v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
The case, known as Furman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am
Lockett, Bessemer, AL ET3 Kelly R. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Instead, in cases such as Lockett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
1978 Lockett v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
” Lockett v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
" Lockett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:16 am
And if there’s any lingering doubts, tell everyone to look up State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
” Lockett v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
United States Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
16 May 2009, 8:46 am
State, 358 So.2d 183 (Fla.1978); Lockett v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
