Search for: "STATE v. LOOMIS" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Here is the story – well-presented by two lawyers from Williams Mullen – of the Seventh Circuit deciding this month, in the case of Loomis v Exelon Corporation, that holding retail class mutual fund shares, rather than cheaper institutional share classes, in a defined contribution plan was not sufficient to establish fiduciary liability. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm by Ruthann Robson
Loomis, United States District Judge Catherine Eagles held the "speech and display" provisions of North Carolina's "The Woman‟s Right to Know Act"... [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:23 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Han-Wei Liu, Ching-Fu Lin and Yu-Jie Chen (Monash University - Department of Business Law & Taxation, National Tsing Hua University and Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica) have posted Beyond State v. [read post]
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s decision in Fick v Loomis Express, 2022 CHRT 2 (CanLII) confirms that it is not always as it seems. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
., advised the Town of Mount Pleasant that it was intending to build a residential facility for six developmentally disabled adults, the Town objected and requested a hearing pursuant to the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.After the Acting Commissioner of the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities rejected the Town’s objections and approved the project, a special proceeding [pursuant to CPLR Article] was filed with the New York State… [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:41 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Loomis[Affirmed; Biles; June 22, 2018]Fourth Amendment violation (improper extension of stop)State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
Penn of Michigan State University or Erik Loomis of the University of Rhode Island, readers argue about whether taxpayer-funded public university professors should or can be fired for their speech. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In State v Loomis, the defense argued that the court’s consideration of risk assessments during sentencing was a violation of due process because the accuracy of the algorithmic prediction could not be verified. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]