Search for: "STATE v. LOOMIS" Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am by Jeremy Saland
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis considered whether the Supreme Court would extend previous precedents to IRAP v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by Amy Howe
” Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
"Conclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient" (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Selassie, 166 AD2d 358, 359, lv denied 77 NY2d 911). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis provided a summary of the case. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
  John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]