Search for: "STATE v. MEYER" Results 341 - 360 of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am by Peter L. Altieri
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am by Rosalind English
The absence of an arguable right under domestic law may not of itself have been determinative of the matter – the concept of a “civil right” is an autonomous one (Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v Belgium (1981) 4 EHRR 1). [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:04 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) has published the abstracts for the Congress online, including the following ones concerning nanomaterials: “Update of potential hazards of nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte, I Iavicoli; “Overview — update of potential hazards of engineered nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte; “Noninvasive biomonitoring of 3 groups of nanomaterials workers with elevated markers of oxidative stress and inflammation,” by D Pelclova,… [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:28 pm
(2) p.619 "Within a few years the first fruits of Brandeis's dissent appeared in, of all places, an opinion of Justice McReynolds [Meyer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Beaty (07-1090) and Iraq v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
Tomorrow, I start my march toward a four-peat, with a post on the Supreme Court’s oral argument in Vance v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:14 am by WSLL
JOHN a/k/a TRINITY POPE v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court in Dauphin County noted that this theory had been rejected previously by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Meyers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined "Petitioner has not shown that [the Medical Board's] determination to deny her application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious or made in violation of lawful procedure", citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined "Petitioner has not shown that [the Medical Board's] determination to deny her application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious or made in violation of lawful procedure", citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]