Search for: "STATE v. PRASAD"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Bommai and Rameshwar Prasad v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
In Inmacs Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In the case of Prasad v Khelawan ([2011] FJHC 123) the High Court of Fiji awarded defamation damages of Fiji $30,000 (£10,000) in respect of defamatory imputations against a teacher on a radio programme. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
The Chairman of the Press Council, Justice Prasad, has expressed his views on a number of topics including press freedom at an event at the Mumbai Press Club. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Match Works v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
As of 1 January 2015, 109 Member States and one non-Member Observer State have extended a standing invitation to thematic special procedures. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
To substantiate the proposition that “in any case” must be construed widely, the Delhi High Court cited the judgment in Lalu Prasad Yadav v State of Bihar, where the Supreme Court did indeed observe that “in any case” means “in all cases”. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
V. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
Rammanandan Prasad Singh, (1916) 1 I.L.R. 43 Cal. 694 at page 706 (P.C.)].21. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:01 am
Brownback and V. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Attorney Gen. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
Ahmad v. [read post]
