Search for: "STATE v. QURESHI"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
By way of example, the elements of the crime of rape as a violation of international law weren’t defined until the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s (ICTR) 1998 Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
On 25 November 2022, judgment was handed down in favour of the claimant in the defamation claim of Gooderson v Qureshi [2022] EWHC 2977 (KB). [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
On the same day Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Gooderson v Qureshi. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Bagby, Pennsylvania State University. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:42 am
United States Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22: On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Hadlock (Michigan State University) and Miriam Schwartz-Ziv (Michigan State University), on Monday, January 7, 2019 Tags: Blockholders, Institutional Investors, Mutual funds, Ownership Climate Change and Proxy Voting in the U.S. and Europe Posted by Maximilian Horster, ISS-ESG; and Kosmas Papadopoulos, ISS Analytics, on Monday, January 7, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Engagement, ESG, Europe, Institutional… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:11 am
In Pizarro v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm
By Zameer Qureshi On November 23, 2016, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued two landmark judgments in Case C-673/13 P (Commission v Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and Pan Europe) and Case C-442/14 (Bayer CropScience and Stichting De Bijenstichting v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am
Eight states and four union territo [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:46 am
Contents include:Leon E Trakman, The Status of Investor - State Arbitration: Resolving Investment Disputes under the Transpacific Partnership AgreementBroussolle Damien, Service, Trade in Services and Trade of Services IndustriesLucas Bastin, Transfer Pricing and the WTO Pablo Zapatero Miguel, Trade in Generics v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:30 pm
Qureshi, 277 Va. 114, 124-125 (2009); and Lloyd v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
Qureshi, Xuan Gao. [read post]
