Search for: "STATE v. REED"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
There are 26 federative states (and the federal district) in Brazil, each of which have the powers to adopt their own Constitutions and laws, subject to the rules and principles provided for under the Federal Constitution. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
Sentencing framework for private sector corruption involving agents In Goh Ngak Eng v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:40 am
” Reed v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
Most recently, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the law firms) respectively moved pre-answer to dismiss the complaint against them as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [7]). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:07 am
In Enervest Operating, LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 10:40 am
Reed v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The “plaintiff must [also] show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney’s negligence” (Mackey Reed Elec., Inc. v Morrone & Assoc., P.C., 125 AD3d 822, 823). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:24 am
In the case of McGuinness v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Lord Reed is the President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
[1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022]… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
Two years later, in Skinner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Carolyn Pepper of Reed Smith LLP writes for the Press Gazette on the application of libel law to ‘deep fakes,’ which are digital impersonations of well-known individuals. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Stanley Reed reports for the New York Times. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
Cairns v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm
Reed argued that small app developers would benefit from antitrust enforcement is the licensing and enforcement of standard-essential patents (SEPs), specifically mentioning the FTC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:06 am
Unfortunately, it cited my old case -- United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
(As enacted, RFRA also provides religious exceptions from state and local laws, but the Supreme Court held that aspect of RFRA unconstitutional in 1997 in City of Boerne v. [read post]
