Search for: "STATE v. RIX"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
First, the PHA states that a “person” may commit the criminal offence or be liable for the civil wrong of harassment (sections 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
The court also approved the reasoning of Rix J in Domicrest, and held that the agreement between Mr Ablyazov and Mr Khrapunov was the harmful event giving rise to the damage and therefore determined the jurisdiction of the English court. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
The court noted that in Birmingham City Council v Shafi [2008] EWCA Civ 1186, Clarke MR and Rix LJ observed that “it has long been recognised that the court’s power to grant relief by way of injunction is to be exercised only in support of some legal or equitable right“. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
Rix LJ disagreed. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:59 am
In the wake of King v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
The debts were therefore immune under the Act and the appeal was dismissed (with Rix LJ dissenting). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
In considering the application, the judge cited Rix LJ in Konkola v Coromin who said that although a stay based on case management is possible it requires "rare and compelling" circumstances. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
RSLs are subject to detailed housing management guidance, which is approved by the Secretary of State [10]. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
The EU law point was not made before the Court of Appeal because it was considered that the decision in G1 (Sudan) [2013] QB 1008 (Laws, Rix and Lewison LJJ) did not allow it to be raised. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:48 am
United Kingdom [1985] 7 EHRR 471, Advic v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
Rix LJ did not agree. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Abbey National v Miller [2006] EWCA Civ 1520; [2007] EWCA Civ 138 Miller-Foulds v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2009] EWCA Civ 1132 You'd be forgiven for not having noticed any of this (long running) litigation over the last 3 years (if only because you need both Casetrack and Lawtel in order to find all four judgments, none of which seem to be on Bailii). [read post]
