Search for: "STATE v. SAFELY"
Results 21 - 40
of 11,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 2:47 am
Regina (Lee) v Same; Regina (Wells) v Same House of Lords “Although the Secretary of State for Justice had failed in his public duty to provide such treatment courses for prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection as would enable them to demonstrate to the Parole Board that it was safe to release them, their post-tariff detention [...] [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 7:44 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Here is the opinion in Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
Yesterday, DataGuidance and Sidley Austin LLP hosted a live Q&A wilth Giovanni Buttarelli, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), to discuss the state of play following the European Court of Justice's decision in Schrems v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:35 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm
For Canada, in particular, strengthening legal protection for Internet platforms could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
The legal question before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) in a November 2, 2022 decision, State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:44 pm
A few cases, mostly from other states, have examined “safe haven” counseling for children. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:19 pm
The Cruz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:24 pm
State, 24 So. 3d 703, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citing State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
That’s because on December 20, 2011, the Ninth Circuit held in UMG v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
R (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 464; [2008] WLR (D) 150 “The scope of the deeming provision in Sch 3, Pt 2, para 3(2) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc) Act 2004, which required states listed in Sch 2, Pt 2, para 2 of the Act to be treated as countries safe for a person to be returned, was limited to the actual process of executive decision or adjudication of whether a person's removal… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:56 pm
Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 3:05 pm
§ 512)—questions remaining in the wake of the same court’s landmark decision in Viacom v. [read post]
