Search for: "STATE v. SALES"
Results 21 - 40
of 21,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
These include unique quality materials and craftsmanship, discounting and promotional activity, omnichannel approach and sales experiences, and production facilities that set it apart from the other segments of the handbag industry. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Conditions of sale and purchase The particular conditions of the sale or confiscation of an artwork must also be considered in the determination of a claim, as they will directly influence the restitution process. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
Lorentzen (Michigan law mandating 20 years’ imprisonment for sale of marijuana ruled cruel and unusual under state and federal constitutions); People v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
However, like all automakers, Ford did experience a dip in sales during the pandemic. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
The court emphasized that jurisdiction will lie only where the defendant “targeted a forum state by identifying listings for removal that, if removed, affect the marketing, sales, or other activities in that state. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:35 am
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
