Search for: "STATE v. STOUT" Results 121 - 140 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
The Michigan offense was dismal, although Utah is known for its stout defense. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
"[1] It is this distinction which also divides the opinions of Stephen Bainbridge, Margaret Blair and Lynn Stout on one side from those of Lucian Bebchuk. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Before trial, the government proffered evidence that Stout had pleaded guilty in state court to surreptitiously videotaping a 14- year old female neighbor while she showered. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 7851 Madison, WI 53707-7851 Phone: (608) 266-9329 Web: http://www.dhfs.state.wi.us State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Wisconsin Council on Developmental Disabilities 600 Williamson Street P.O. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
For another, to the extent a plaintiff's lawyer is naive (or confident) enough to bring a true "personal injury" class action, that case could probably get into federal court without CAFA's help, since showing that a named plaintiff's personal injury claim exceeds $75,000 shouldn't be too stout a showing. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
In constructing this argument, Drury discusses Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]