Search for: "STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CREEK COUNTY"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2015, 8:01 pm
After sentencing, Kerkel appealed to the superior court, which affirmed. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:41 am
Porter Superior Court Judge William Alexa upheld the plan commission's rejection, and the Arndts appealed to the higher court. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
The Court similarly rejected plaintiffs’ erosion impact arguments, stating: “Nothing in the record indicates there is a fair argument that placement of the spoils on a two percent grade, at least 100 feet from the creek, covered with straw mulch, and isolated by erosion control measures, will significantly affect water quality in the creek. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
Superior Court of San Joaquin County (Indian Child Welfare Act) In re Peters/Brinton/Mathews, In re N. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States of America v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
`While this [c]ourt retains its authority to make its own findings of fact, we recognize the superior position of the family court in making credibility determinations.' S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The boundary of the resource management plan includes the 11,999 acre specific plan site, and the 1,517-acre Salt Creek conservation area in Ventura County which adjoins the specific plan area to the southeast. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Monroe County, the Supreme Court held that Alabama sheriff-defendants represented the state as a whole, not their individual counties, when executing their law enforcement duties. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
In Azusa Land Partners v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
