Search for: "STATE v. TRISTAN" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
  Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) reports on a recent decision of Mr Justice Birss in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 on the issue. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
Authors: Tristan Dollie, Imogen Wilson The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25[1] has ruled on the point at which company directors must have regard to the interests of creditors (the so-called “creditors’ interest duty”) as set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006[2] (the “2006 Act”). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:01 am
" Today the woman who died at age 41 (4 years before her daughter gave birth to Tristan's grandson, who would become the renowned painter Paul Gauguin) isrecognized as a thinker whose works bridged the gap between 'utopian' and 'scientific' socialism and helped lay the foundations for modern feminist theory.... 1969 (40 years ago today), in Stanley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Wystan Ackerman
  Tristan Duncan also noted that, when a class action is litigated in state court, there may be a viable argument that the state court’s interpretation of state law violates due process (e.g., because a very vague “unfairness” standard is being applied)  or constitutes a judicial taking. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
  With the continued viability of Saucier hanging in the balance in Pearson v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:50 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Absent a successful government appeal, it seems extremely difficult for prosecutors going forward in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
This Kat would like to thank his colleague Tristan Sherliker, a solicitor at EIP Legal, for this interesting copyright mewsing. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm by zshapiro
In order to find that GPS devices require a search warrant the Court had to distinguish the use of GPS devices from the use of beepers in the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]